That’s right. They should be prosecuted. In a moment, I’ll show you why.
But first, here’s the definition of “Prosecute,” courtesy of The Free Dictionary:
A. To initiate or conduct a criminal case against: prosecute a defendant for murder.
B. To initiate or conduct (a civil case or legal action): prosecute a lawsuit for libel.
C. To initiate or conduct legal proceedings regarding (an offense, for example)
Now, let’s use that word in a couple of sentences.
“The DOJ’s head, Jeff Sessions, has been very clear on his position that people who cross the border illegally should be criminally prosecuted, whether they have kids with them or not.” Read more
Here’s another example:
“A Rent-A-Center spokesperson told WFAA that the company had 450,000 active rental contracts in Texas in 2017. Of the active contracts, 30,661 were classified as ‘skips or stolen’ because the customer did not return the merchandise. Among the delinquent accounts, the company sent out only 223 demand letters to customers. And not all the demand letters led to a formal complaint to police for prosecution.” More
With this in mind, let’s delve into why (some) franchise executives should be prosecuted for doing things they shouldn’t be doing.
What Some Franchise Executives Are Guilty Of
Bluntly, some franchise executives are guilty of awarding (selling) franchises to people who are unqualified and/or under-capitalized. The reasons are many, and they include:
1. The need for cash flow
It must be remembered that all businesses need cash flow. It’s what keeps them up and running.
In the case of franchising, cash flow is needed for things like operations, franchisee support, technology, franchise sales, marketing, advertising and more. And it’s the upfront franchise fees* that helps keep the money flowing in.
*A lot of people are under the assumption that franchise fees are serious profit for franchisors. They’re not. It’s the franchise royalties.
Basically, when you’re a new-or relatively new franchisor, there aren’t many franchisees. That means less royalty income. So, you need to sell new franchises.
Which makes it very tempting to sell franchises to less than qualified people.
Barring any mitigating circumstances, franchise executives should be charged with a crime-and prosecuted, if they knowingly sell franchises to the wrong people.
2. The need to make a sale (But they’re selling lousy franchise opportunities)
It’s important to know that franchise “executives” aren’t necessarily CEO’s, V.P.’s and Directors.
*The IFA offers a Certified Franchise Executive™ program. This program is
offered sold to all IFA members who are involved in the sale of franchises.
One of the reasons franchise industry folks pay for the certification, according to the Institute of Certified Franchise Executives™ web page, is that it’s “A symbol of leadership and accomplishment” and “The CFE designation is highly regarded by the franchising community.”
An Example Of A Lousy Franchise Opportunity
What follows is a perfect example of a lousy franchise business opportunity. It’s a little-known franchise business concept called Clubstore Outlet.
The franchisor was recently the focus of a multi-article story researched and written by Sean Kelly, who owns and operates the Unhappy Franchisee website.
Get The Facts
Schedule A Complimentary Call
“Who makes money when a flawed, undercaptialized, non-franchiseable or otherwise doomed franchise opportunity is launched?”
– Sean Kelly, from one of his Clubstore Outlet franchise articles
In the Clubstore Outlet nightmare, money was made by franchise brokers, franchise marketers, and the franchisor-basically a whole slew of franchise executives.
FYI: Franchising is mostly scam-free-but like in any type of business, there are bad apples.
Note: As The Franchise King®, I feel that it’s my obligation to share the good and the bad in franchising today. It’s my duty to inform and protect all prospective franchise owners from harm. From losing their money. It’s a big part of what I do.
Today’s Franchise Executives Should Be Prosecuted For Doing This
The other thing that franchise execs should be prosecuted for: giving false earnings claims to prospective franchisees.
It’s important to know that the issue of giving franchise earnings claims is a pretty sticky one. Especially since every person who’s interested in buying a franchise wants (and needs) to know how much they’ll potentially earn as franchisees. Here’s what the Federal Trade Commission states:
“A franchisor isn’t required to disclose information about potential income or sales. If it does, the law requires it to have a reasonable basis for the claim when it’s made and to include the claim in Item 19 of the FDD. If a franchisor makes a claim that has a reasonable basis, the FDD also must disclose:
The source and limitations of data that support the claim
Any important assumptions on which the claim is based”
Believe me, pretty much anyone who’s been involved in franchising for more than a few months knows that they’re not allowed to give earnings claims unless specific criteria has been met. (That criteria is listed on the FTC website. Just click the link above.) But it still happens. How do I know?
Specifically, my clients tell me that their franchise salespeople do talk to them about franchisee earnings, and they do it in the totally wrong way.
An Illegal Earnings Claim Example
Would you like to find out if the franchisor you’re working with is on the up and up? Ask the franchise salesperson-or the franchise consultant, this question:
You: “Peter, I’m used to making a good living, so I need to ask you something. Is it possible for me to make $100,000 a year with the franchise?”
The answer you get is really important. Choose the one below that you think is the “illegal” one:
A. “Well, Monica, believe it or not, I’m not supposed to answer your question. That’s because our FDD does not disclose franchisee earnings. You’ll need to call franchisees to find out the answer to your question.”
B. “Monica, I’m glad you asked, and I have good news for you. In most cases, Monica, people who buy our franchise opportunity make $100,000 or more as a franchisee.”
C. “Monica, if you open up the FDD, you’ll be able to see franchisee earnings. Of course, they’re averages, but you should be able to get a good sense of how much you’ll be able to make-on average, as a franchisee.”
Over to you: Which answer includes an illegal earnings claim? A, B, or C? (I’ll wait)
In this case, the correct answer is B.
Consequently, if you ever get an answer like that, it’s a huge
That’s because it’s a promise.
Think about it: what if the franchise representative tells you that you will be able to make $100,000 a year as a franchisee-and you don’t? How would that make you feel?
Would you be angry enough to sue the franchisor…and maybe even the franchise executive?
In like manner, do you think that you would contact the authorities, so the franchisor and the franchise executive could be prosecuted?
To summarize, as far as I’m concerned, franchise executives should be prosecuted if they give false/illegal earnings claims, sell a lousy franchise opportunity, or sell a franchise to someone who is unqualified.
That’s because they’re all forms of fraud. And the things they’re doing affect livelihoods…lives actually, in a very bad way. That’s not what franchise ownership is supposed to do.
Instead, franchise ownership is meant to positively affect lives.
To put it differently, buying a franchise should change your life in a good way, as it’s a chance to be your own boss. To say nothing of a chance for you to potentially create wealth for yourself and your family-instead of your boss.
In any event, you shouldn’t have to worry about franchise executives doing bad things…things they could get prosecuted for.
The only thing you should worry about is choosing the wrong franchise.
Top image courtesy of Dover AFB
Image #2 courtesy of antwerpenR on Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/5671701564