E-Cigarette Franchises | Really?

image of e-cigarette

Here they come.

Someone’s going to do it. E-Cigarette franchises may soon be in your neighborhood.

Soon, an entrepreneur will open an E-Cigarette store and turn it into a franchise business.

Then, someone else will. And so on.

I can’t wait.

 

E-Cigarettes Are Hot

More and more people are smoking them. Well, kind of. They’re not really smoking them. They’re “vaporing” them. What?

Last week, I attended a meeting with around 75 other people, and I noticed someone smoking a few rows up. I found it strange, since there’s no smoking practically everywhere these days.

I took out my handy pocket binoculars, and zoomed in on the offender and his left hand to make sure that I wasn’t experiencing some kind of weird flashback….you know, just to make sure that I actually was seeing someone smoking a cigarette indoors. What I found…

Someone was smoking an E-Cigarette, and I was not happy.

e-cigarette smoke vapor

I was definitely seeing smoke exiting his oral cavity. And, I had visions of E-Cigarette stores-franchises, popping up around town.

The smoking-vaping as it’s commonly called, wasn’t constant. He was smoking his electronic cigarette every few minutes. One puff at a time. It was bothersome. I’ll admit it: I copped an attitude. A major attitude. I was really resentful. Who the heck did this 20-something think he was? I was in a non-smoking building, attending a public meeting, and here’s this dude, smoking his E-Cigarette, sending his “vapor” into the atmosphere. My atmosphere.

 

The Danger of E-Cigarettes

I don’t believe for one minute that E-Cigarettes are safe. I won’t even bother listening to the manufacturers. Will you?

E-Cigarettes (probably) aren’t safe for the users and they’re probably not safe for those in the general area of the vapor.

The video below looks at what may be the dark side of E-Cigarettes.
 

 

E-Cigarette Franchises

It almost happened already.

An E-Cigarette company by the name of Clearette, out of New York, almost chose franchising as their primary distribution method, but decided against it. Instead, they’ve decided to go with independent distributors.

From a company press release:

We took a look at going franchise,” says Leonardo Lombardo, CEO of Clearette, “and we immediately realized we did not need to do that to create distribution and make money. Why charge some guy a big number? I mean, for what? Training? A binder or something? We know our products are great, our margins are great, we don’t need to take some guy’s nest egg, or make him go get a big SBA loan, for everyone to be successful.”

Just because Clearette decided against using the franchise model for distribution of their product doesn’t mean that another manufacturer won’t go the franchise route. Mark my words, there will be at least one E-Cigarettes franchise launched within the next year. One reason:

E-Cigarettes sales are expected to reach almost $2 Billion in 2014.

Update: New E-Cigarette Franchise Launched

E-Cigarettes are hot, and today’s franchise buyer’s want hot.

 

Franchise Lawsuits

But, do they want to be involved in future lawsuits from former E-Cigarette users? You know…the ones that will be exhibiting all sorts of health problems a couple of years from now.

Call me paranoid, but inhaling vapors that include the same ingredient used in anti-freeze can’t be good.

I know that I don’t want to be anywhere near it, and I’m not alone.

E-Cigarette smoking has already been banned in three states.

Cough.

Protect Your Franchise Business. Consider Incorporating.
 
CorpNet is the fastest way to incorporate your business
 

 

Buying A Franchise? Read The Blog Posts Below For Powerful Tips

You Must Do This Before You Buy A Franchise
A Fantastic Free Government-Funded Resource
How To Experience The Thrill Of Franchise Ownership

Search For A Franchise Now

  • Mike McCormack

    vaping? how vapid…

    • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

      Strange words, huh?

      Let’s just go with “smoke.”

      Thanks for stopping by!

      JL

  • Pingback: BizSugar.com()

  • Graham Rogers

    I’m not sure if the video is that balanced. But E Cigarettes are supposed to be a lot safer than cigarettes. But how safe we don’t know. Only time will tell. The comments on the YouTube video tell you that they are very popular with smokers, so the potential market for a franchise business is huge.

    • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

      They sure are getting popular, Graham!

      Thanks for including my articles in your cool new magazine!

      JL

  • http://about.me/Lindeskog lyceum1776

    Joel: I am for freedom of choice (as Nat Sherman is stating is so eloquently on their cigarette packages) and I have no problem with e-cigarettes, although I wouldn’t use them myself. If I want to smoke something, it will be a cigarillo or cigar, together with an espresso or a glass of port wine.

    Please let the market decide if this franchise will be hot trend, or a fad…

    • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

      Martin,

      Freedom of choice is great.

      It’s my choice to not be near any potentially toxic chemicals…agents, if I can help it.

      The market IS deciding.

      It’s a fad. As soon as these E-Cigs are banned indoors in more states, they’ll be gone.

      Like a puff of smoke.

      JL

      • Scott L

        Don’t you look silly. The AHA admitted they are safer than cigs and the trend is growing fast.

        And there are not potentially toxic chemicals in an e cigarette. You are free to have an opinion, but try to make it less obvious you did 0 research and have no idea what you are talking about.

        Tell me again, what toxic chemicals and agents are present in an e-cigarette.

        And, before you answer – let me spare you from looking stupid; nicotine is NOT a toxic chemical.

      • Moe

        You and your article are just that ……. “a puff of smoke”

  • http://sigecig.com/ best electronic cigarette

    A vapor cigarette is really the same thing as an ecig
    Try a SigECig Disposable Ecigarette, it is just like smoking but with a vapor cigarette.
    You can discover amazing flavors and variety when you smoke on a vapor cigarette.
    A Signature E-Cigarette ecig is a better alternative to a regular cigarette, because an ecig is just a vapor cigarette.

  • Ariana Velazco

    This is a pretty biased and unprofessional article… “I don’t believe for one minute that E-Cigarettes are safe. *I won’t even bother listening to the manufacturers*. Will you?” what the heck kind of stance is that, coming from a franchise coach/advisor?
    And yes, you are being paranoid when you say you don’t want to “inhale vapors that include the same ingredient used in anti-freeze” -and for the sake of argument, let’s assume you know that that ingredient is Propylene Glycol-, because not only is this component’s oral toxicity infinitesimal (meaning a person cannot be poisoned from consuming it through oral means -vaping included-), but it has been approved by the FDA to be added, as a food additive, to an immense amount of processed foods that you, me, and pretty much anybody reading this mindless article buys at their local grocery store. And oh my God, linking that faux fact of yours, with the potential for law suits, to try and suggest that this is not a good franchise to buy, is even stupider.
    Lastly, what country are you talking about when you say E-cigarettes have been banned in 3 states? You can’t be referring the USA because, surely you know that E-cig related Federal Regulations are still being reviewed, and actual prohibitions currently in place only relate to the sale/possession of e-cigs *by MINORS*, and in whatever states those bans are in place, they don’t have statewide jurisdiction. Any other “regulation” stipulates disclosure of ingredients and manufacture safety of the devices used to vape. That’s it. So, what’s your point again?

    • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

      Ariana,

      My point it this: The safety-or non-safety of the vapor that’s being emitted by these gizmos worries me and lots of other people, too. I am not a scientist, and I don’t want to be one. And, I don’t want to look up the ingredients. All I know is that the FDA is looking into these things, and I don’t think that there’s going to be a positive outcome for e-cig manufacturers. And, I think franchising a retail shop that focuses on the product is a very high-risk proposition.

      Why would folks want to get involved in a business that has the potential to have it’s lights turned off by regulators. And, please keep those vapors away from me, indoors.

      I have a feeling that the chemicals will be proven to be carcinogenic.

      That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.

      Thanks for commenting, but please keep the name-calling out of your next one.

      The Franchise King®

      • Fred At

        You are biased and completely uneducated in your writing and your logic. Using your personal opinions and no facts at all. Liquid is made in the USA now and the FDA is involved because that’s the normal process for such products. Ecigs are saving lives. 500000 die every year die to tobacco according to the US health department. Please do your homework

        • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

          Fred,
          What exactly IS in the vapor that the non-vaping public is being exposed to?

          Exactly.

          THAT’S why the FDA is involved, and will be until the e-cig business disappears in a puff of vapor.

          JL

          • Fred At

            Well, either you are benefiting by stating provocative things or you are truly uneducated. Either way I am not going to do your homework for you and present to you scientific research that is out there already. Obviously you being oppositional in your opinions and closed minded will drive traffic to your blog and your name. I am done with you since you are such an unbiased intellectual.

          • Scott L

            Your ignorance is painful. If you want to know what is in it, why don’t you look it up – instead of publishing an article that suggests it is dangerous.

            The whole ABC video is laughable (and the basis of your argument). My doctor said they are dangerous, says this former ecig user. *cut scene to doctor* “We don’t know if they are dangerous or not, and that is dangerous” (translation: I have no idea what I am talking about, but I still have an opinion)

            It is reasonable to request others not to release vapor from e cigs in your vicinity. That is a personal preference that doesn’t require substantiation. The only major study done on “passive” vaping does show that those exposed to ‘second hand’ vapors do absorb a negligible amount of nicotine, but at a rate almost 6x less than those exposed to traditional cigarettes. In addition, there are about 500-2000 (depending on brand of cigarette) fewer ingredients and chemicals than cigarettes that are not in the water vapor. Please note that nicotine is not a known carcinogen. The known cancer causing ingredients from cigarettes are from the hundreds of unrelated chemicals the smoker is exposed to.

            The reality is, a doctor telling a smoker of 40 years to stop using a smoking alternative that has 3 FDA approved FOOD ingredients (used in everyday foods) mixed with nicotine and without the hundreds of other known cancer causing ingredients – simply because they have no idea what they are talking about – shows how terrible a doctor they are. Notice the story doesn’t say this women stopped consuming nicotine… just that she stopped using e cigs. That means the Dr. actually harmed the woman! The American Heart Association recently admitted that vaping is less harmful than traditional cigarettes (although they note they aren’t sure how much less harmful) and this doctors ignorance likely caused this woman to stop using a known effective nicotine quitting method AND a method of consuming nicotine that is, according even to the American Heart Association, much safer.

            Worse? Your ignorance and assumptions led to you writing an article based on 0 facts and 100% false assumption and fear mongering. How big of a deal is this?

            Well, some poor sap might have read your sorry excuse of educational material and decided to keep smoking regular cigarettes instead of changing over to vaping. They are now consuming hundreds of known cancer causing chemicals and on the path to killing themselves with harsh chemicals instead of switching to a safer alternative that can actually aid them in quitting nicotine all together.

            Ignorance has consequences. Ignoring those consequences is stupid. You might help someone die because of this article.

          • Moe

            Franchise Emperor with no clothes…. sounds like you are resentful at the ecig industry so that disqualifies you as a “franchise mentor/coach”. The non-vaping public is being exposed to water vapor, plain and simple.

            The FDA is involved because ecigs is human consumption of an ingredient so they, by standard, must be involved. Also, anyone that carries and uses binoculars in a business meeting has some serious issues involved. Please seek help, there is medication out there that is FDA approved for your use :)

      • Moe

        The franchise king places uneducated opinions on the matter, and “he’s sticking to it”…. You don’t sound like a franchise king, you sound like a Franchise Emperor with no clothes

  • ben

    This is a pathetic excuse for an article… There is not antifreeze in eCigarette Eliquid… Can’t even commit to basic research.. You should be embarrassed.

    • Scott L

      “I have no idea what I am talking about, but I believe in my opinion passionately” – The Franchise King

  • Moe

    This has to be the most illogical post I have seen in a long time. “Franchise Lawsuits” “same ingredient used in anti-freeze” “I was really resentful” “my atmosphere”…… wow!!! You are an editor of a franchise advisement site, and you are placing your personal opinions over business advisement that your readers are asking for. You sir, are a fallacy.

    If you had used facts instead of uneducated opinion, you might be taken a little more seriously, but in all honesty I don’t even think that would save you from the egg on your face.

    – “Franchise Lawsuits” please take the time to explain this one, because in all honesty I died laughing on this remark.

    – “Same ingredient as used in anti-freeze” I loved this one as well. NO EJUICE MAKER USES ANTI-FREEZE INGREDIENTS

    – “I was really resentful, my atmosphere” This sounds like a personal problem to me…almost like the person that takes selfies 100 times a day and is diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder.

    Sir, get your facts straight and keep your ridiculous thoughts on the matter off of the subject.

    Thanking you in advance,
    Moe “the person that called you out”

    • Moe

      By the way, I realize that I may have been too “ad-hominem” for your taste, and for that I will not apologize. You have a responsibility as an editor to present the facts and let the business person make that decision based on financial wants, needs and personal gains and losses. Again, you are a fallacy as is your article :)

    • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

      Moe,

      I’m 100% sure that the e-cig manufactures and the makers of the nicotine recipes are focused on their customers safety. And, I’m also 100% sure they have been testing their products for years…just to make sure everything is on the up and up. I’m not worried at all.

      The Franchise King®

      • Moe

        Actually, the manufacturers of the hardware involved and the ejuice test their products constantly. If they ever served a product that was harmful to society, then why the explosion in the industry? This is not methamphetamines we are talking about (where any concoction is used to get the “final result”), this is nicotine based juice that is used in a heating element to produce a water vapor, that once inhaled, the body removes the nicotine and what is exhaled is a water vapor, Plain and simple.

        To make statements such as “anti-freeze type elements” displays a true lack of knowledge in the industry, and instead a leaning towards personal sentiment. To make that statement is just like agreeing that Colin Powell pleaded his case to the United Nations (weapons of mass destruction caches) based on fact (which why now know is a falsehood in complete extremity).

        If the sight of vapor or an element that is similar to smoke offends you, then displace your line of vision, or your body in it’s entirety away from the offending scene. But do yourself a favor and don’t throw sticks at something that you do not have knowledge in. What that does is expel you from the “business standing” that you have placed yourself as an editor.

        I can state this for a fact though, I am not 100% sure that you are stating fact for your readers that subscribe to your articles, or are truly looking out for their business interests. Maybe, the fact is that you have not had a vice in your life whatsoever, so maintaining the holier than thou approach is an easier placement for you. Maybe, you subscribe to the falsehoods being preached to the general public by Big Tobacco or Big Pharmaceutical that are against this industry (truth be told, they are preaching falsehoods such as flormaldehyde in ecigs since they are losing financial ground to this industry).

        I am glad that you are not worried at all, hopefully you can share your sentiments with your readers as well instead of placing falsehoods such as “anti-freeze elements” or any other sarcastic comments.

        If not, I will make the statement to your readers for you. This is a great industry, and in any industry there is risk involved. Perform your due diligence, do your homework and make a financial decision based on fact not spineless sentiments based on feelings of inadequacy.

        Your move partner………..

        • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

          From The Washington Post:

          “Because they’re unregulated, you don’t necessarily know what’s in them. In 2009, the FDA detected diethylene glycol, a toxic chemical used in antifreeze, in some e-cig samples and carcinogens called nitrosamines in others.’

          And

          “Questions also linger over secondhand “vapor.” A December 2013 study compared exhaled vapor from three e-cigarette brands with exhaled tobacco smoke and found that the e-cig vapor contained about one-tenth the level found in tobacco smoke. But the researchers didn’t test for some of the other potentially unsafe components of vapor that earlier studies had found, including formaldehyde and metal particles.”

          Again, there’s no way that anything harmful is in the vapor or the cartridges. No way.

          JL

          • Moe

            Diethylene glycol is a problem in the industry as makers of ejuice based in China use this substance with frequency. That is why there needs to be regulation so that china based juicemakers are not in the market.

            And in regards to your quote over flormaldehyde and metalic particles, that has already been disproven. Flormaldehyde and metallic particles are found in vapor when the heating element is at 1100 degrees Celsius, again I repeat Celsius. The human body cannot inhale that type of heat, so again, more dirty sticks being thrown at this industry by naysayers. But as you said, I am not worried at all.

            But if a person is worried about flormaldehyde or the nonsense being tossed around, then my argument to these morons would be the following, “Make sure that you do not take a hot shower, since water passes through lead pipes (somewhere in the water trail) then there is a big risk of some type of harmful element being produced by a combination of water, heat, and lead pipes.”

            Do you see how foolish that argument is?

            Please quote your source in regards to the “december 2013” study. That study was disproven a long time ago. And, those who have “questions that linger” …. maybe we need to practice the old adage “follow the money”..

            is this checkmate?

          • Moe

            Still awaiting your response…….

          • http://thefranchiseking.com/about-joel-libava-the-franchise-king The Franchise King

            This can be whatever you want.

            I’m sure more will be revealed about e-cigs and their dangers.

            Thanks for taking the time to share your views.

            I shared mine.

            JL

  • Jjusttheletter Rhoades

    Largest waste of space online so far about vape-franchise information. More like an anti-nicotine blog then anything. Facts, wrong. Sources, wrong. These comments should head the page so as to not waste time reading anything else on it.